Powered by

Case Study Choosing the Right Vacuum Impregnation Program

Editor: Nicole Kareta

Choosing the right impregnation process and sealant is critical in purchasing in-house vacuum impregnation equipment. This case study shows how a manufacturer was able to reduce costs, increase quality and improve efficiency.

Related Companies

Godfrey & Wing recommended its CFi system to solve the manufacturer's challenges.
Godfrey & Wing recommended its CFi system to solve the manufacturer's challenges.
(Source: Godfrey & Wing)

In 2008, a North American motorcycle OEM decided to insource their vacuum impregnation requirements to reduce manufacturing costs. The OEM considered multiple sealant and equipment technologies. The company was sold on equipment that claimed to eliminate wastewater discharge, seal castings at a better rate, and would require minimal adjustments, maintenance, and repair. The equipment selected used a recycling sealant.

The Challenge

Over time, the manufacturer discovered what they were sold was different from reality. They found that the recyclable sealant’s chemistry changed over time, and so did the recovery results. The nature of recyclable sealant required it to be mixed with water in the impregnation process. While the sealant was pure at first, it lost its properties once in contact with water, and never returned to its original formulation.

Gallery

Also, a wash water conditioner was required to maintain the sealant effectiveness. But this additive had to be added daily, and at an exact ratio to be effective. If the ratio was not correct, then the sealant became unstable. The manufacturer found that excess chemicals carried into the wash and cure modules increased part contamination and damaged the system.

The system proved to be remarkably expensive. The manufacturer booked over a USD1,000,000 of expenses due to scrap parts, repairs, maintenance, labor, sealant consumables, and sealant support chemistry. The cost of managing the system exceeded the cost to outsource the impregnation process.

 

The realization set in that its vacuum impregnation strategy needed to change, and they had an opportunity to do so at the start of a new crankcase program. The company designed a new, lighter crankcase that required 100 % of the parts to be sealed. Based on prior experience and data, the company determined that three main challenges needed to be overcome when selecting a new impregnation system.

  • 1. Maintenance Cost: The old system consumed components at a remarkable rate. The manufacturer needed an easier system to operate with less maintenance.
  • 2. Sealant Management: The recyclable sealant required excessive testing and maintenance. The manufacturer needed a sealant that maintained its original formulation that does not require daily maintenance by multiple departments.
  • 3. Poor Recovery: The system had a fall out of approximately 14 % of the castings. Any parts that were not recovered were scrapped. The cost of the scrapped castings totaled approximately USD967,000. The manufacturer needed to recover more castings.

The Solution

Based on these challenges, Godfrey & Wing recommended its Continuous Flow Impregnation (CFi) system with a recoverable sealant.

 

The CFi uses a Dry Vacuum and Pressure (DVP) impregnation process to incorporate a fast, deep vacuum to evacuate the air from the porosity. After moving sealant into the chamber, high pressure forces the sealant deep into the casting.

The recoverable sealant remains pure throughout the entire process. The CFi’s impregnation module is designed to recover the sealant in its original formulation. Once the part is impregnated, the part moves to a centrifuge to recover any unused sealant. The unused sealant is returned to the sealant reservoir for future cycles. By retaining the pure sealant, the customer can maximize recovery with no additives, or excessive maintenance.

 

After impregnation, the part moves to the wash and cure stations. Since there is no excess sealant, the wash water remains clean. This enables the part to be properly washed and part contamination is eliminated.

 

The system was designed with maintenance and service at top-of-mind. The internal components are positioned to enable ease of maintenance without interrupting production. The maintenance team can service principal components through the rear access panels. Quick disconnect fittings are used so that they can be maintained by hand without the need for specialty tools. Each module has a line-rated disconnect so that maintenance does not need to power down the entire system for service.

The Results

After the manufacturer decided to install the CFi, operators and maintenance were trained, and the system processed parts immediately. Since then, the system is addressing the manufacturer’s challenges.

  • 1. Reduced Maintenance Cost: The manufacturer is expected to save approximately USD35,000 per year in maintenance and spare parts.
  • 2. Efficient and Easy Sealant Management: The manufacturer no longer needs to purchase wash water conditioner, and sealant maintenance and oversight is significantly reduced. The manufacturer will save approximately USD20,000 per year in sealant costs.
  • 3. Improved Casting Recovery: The CFi’s First Time Through (FTT) rate is 99 %. This 14-point increase over the previous recovery rate will save approximately USD630,000 per year in recovered castings.

In total, the cost savings and improved recovery is expected to save the manufacturer approximately USD685,000 per year, enabling the capital expense recovery to be less than 24 months.

(ID:47031955)