Mobile-Menu
Search
Ralf Versmold

Ralf Versmold

Managing Director, Godfrey & Wing

Vacuum Impregnation Enables Lightweight Material Use

| Author / Editor: Ralf Versmold / Daniel Richter

Recent decades have seen a surge in use of aluminum castings in car manufacturing. Aluminum has been a key material in car manufacturing since the beginning. Vacuum impregnation enables using lightweight material in the automotive sector by now.

The redesign of vacuum impregnation equipment has improved quality and production.
( Bild: Godfrey & Wing )

As this surge has happened, vacuum impregnation has become the primary method to eliminate the porosity inherent in aluminum castings. OEMs are redesigning parts and bringing vacuum impregnation systems in-house to meet the aluminum use demand.

CAFE Standards

Due to new federal fuel-efficiency regulations, automakers must meet Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. The CAFE standard for 2017 passenger cars is 38.13 mpg. For light trucks, it is 30.67 mpg. These required averages will increase to 53.34 and 40.29 respectively by 20251.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, reducing a car’s weight by 10 percent will improve fuel economy by 6 to 8 percent2. OEMs are thus investing in lightweighting frames and powertrains to meet these standards.


Lightweight Material

This investment means a greater use of aluminium. The use of aluminum has grown continuously to not only meet CAFE standards, but to also improve automotive performance. A lower vehicle weight has better acceleration, braking and handling. Lighter vehicles can tow and haul large loads because the engine is not carrying unnecessary weight. Even though aluminum is light, it does not sacrifice strength. Aluminum body structure is equal to strength in steel and can absorb twice as much crash-induced energy. The rigors of aluminum structures give one a better feel and precise control on the road. Aluminum allows for better fuel efficiency and driving stability.

But that presents a new challenge: porosity, which is inherent in the material. If the porosity is not sealed, fluids or gases will seep from the part when under pressure. Parts that leak fluids or gases are typically rejected, increasing costs and production delays.

Vacuum Impregnation

Vacuum impregnation seals porosity in metals. The process was developed in the 1940s and has evolved in recent years to be safer, more efficient and more effective. Generally, the process can be outlined with the following steps.

Step 1
The part is placed in an impregnation chamber, where a deep vacuum is created to evacuate air from the leak path.

Step 2
The evacuated leak path is filled with sealant by covering the part with the sealant and applying pressure.

Step 3
The part is moved to a wash/rinse station. Here, residual sealant is washed from the part’s internal passages, taps, pockets and features where sealant is undesirable.

Step 4
The part is moved to a cure station. Here, the impregnated sealant is polymerized in the leak path with hot water.

Vacuum Impregnation Used in Aluminum

Vacuum impregnation seals porosity without changing the castings' dimensional or functional characteristics. This allows manufacturers to use parts that would otherwise be scrapped. It is a simple method, and is approved by OEMs for a variety of components.

Two examples include:

Lower Crank Case
This crank case supports the crank shaft in the middle of the cylinder block. Made from cast iron, it would weigh approximately 45 pounds. Made from aluminum, as is now typically, it weighs just 18 pounds.

The frame is now manufactured out of aluminum, while the bearing caps are manufactured from steel. These steel bearing caps see increased force and pressure from supporting the crank shaft and bearings, so these must be made from a denser, stronger material.
This case has passages that feed the bearings with oil. If the porosity in the aluminum is not sealed, oil will leak from the part. Vacuum impregnation allows the part to retain its intended use without losing any dimensional or functional characteristics.

Cylinder Block
Another example of aluminum parts that use vacuum impregnation is a vehicle’s cylinder block. Made from cast iron, the block would weigh approximately 185 pounds. Made from aluminum, it weighs about 70 pounds.

This cylinder block is manufactured from aluminum while the cylinder bores have steel liners. The bores would not be able to withstand the wear or heat force if they were in aluminum.
Fluids and gases flow through this part while in use, and can seep from any porosity in the aluminum. Once again, vacuum impregnation allows the part to be pressure tight and fully functional.

As part designs have changed, so too has the use of vacuum impregnation.

Vacuum Impregnation Systems

In order to meet the demand increase of aluminum components, OEMs have brought vacuum impregnation systems in-house. Aluminum used by car manufacturers is currently 400 pounds per car. It is expected to reach 550 pounds by 2025. To meet this growing demand, OEMs are taking advantage of recent redesigns in vacuum impregnation systems.

Until the 2000’s, vacuum impregnation typically employed “batch systems.” Workers would load multiple parts from the top into a large basket for processing. Batch systems were prone to quality issues. Complex castings, like the two previously mentioned, were difficult to impregnate. Large batches could not be adequately washed and rinsed, increasing “sealant contamination”. This rendered many parts unusable or jeopardized assembly.

Additionally, large batch systems increased WIP (Work in Process), labor and maintenance costs. Floor space to lay down large batches of incoming parts and inspect and pack-out impregnated parts was too costly and impractical in today’s machining or assembly plants.This forced manufacturers to “outsource” their impregnation requirements. Expensive out sourcing solved the labor and floor space issue but poor quality (now out of the manufacturer’s care, custody and control), costly transportation and production delays emerged as critical issues.

The redesign of vacuum impregnation equipment offered the following benefits:

Improved Quality
Equipment was redesigned to be “front-loading,” and thus more ergonomic. And they were redesigned to process just single pieces or a small number of castings. This change increased seal rate, while decreasing sealant contamination and damage.

Improved Production
Systems were also redesigned to use robotic handling between the stations. This reduced cycle times, improved overall production cycle time and production volumes. The new systems were smaller than batch systems and their modular design enabled them to integrate with other production operations. Their use improved quality and, at the same time, eliminated WIP and unnecessary, costly transportation and production delays.

Vacuum Impregnation System at Work

If the lower crank case and cylinder block previously mentioned were processed in a batch system, then the typical failure modes would be:

  • Parts leak after impregnation (poor recovery)
  • Parts are damaged during the impregnation process
  • Contamination of parts during the impregnation process

These challenges can quickly cause quality issues and production delays. By impregnating these parts in a modern system, then the expected results would be:

  • Near 100% casting recovery
  • Zero PPM for handling damage
  • Zero PPM for contamination

This is because single piece flow packages parts so they are efficiently and effectively sealed. Batch systems stack parts on top of each other. This compromises the effectiveness of the cleaning and potential part damage. Robotics, on the other hand, properly and efficiently move parts between each station. This eliminates the risk of part mishandling and sealant contamination.

Today’s PLC controlled and robotic tended units are self-contained for quality. Working in tandem, the PLC and robot ensure that parts that have not been properly impregnated do not move forward into production. Pre-set parameters control every step of the process. Should the system fault and any specified processing parameter is not met, the PLC will signal the robot to contain the suspect component for management’s evaluation.

In the same way the smaller manually attended units utilize sensors and a PLC to control the process and alert the attendant to any irregularities.

Where the Action is

Both the size and the modular design of the new impregnation systems enable manufacturers to locate the units immediately within the machining, testing or build areas, placing the solution right where it’s needed.

This cellular approach further reduces costs and improves production efficiency. Part handling, movement and tracking are reduced or all together eliminated, especially when compared to out-sourcing.

Since all systems are PLC controlled, data acquisition, an essential in today’s manufacturing environment, can be baked-in to the process in order to strengthen the plant’s overall quality production system. Individual data points on all key parameters can be collected and stored with individual part serial numbers. If questions arise, a system audit will provide valuable data on every part that has been impregnated.

Do More with Less

CAFE standards require manufacturers to “do more with less.” Manufacturers are specifying lighter materials and thinner walls with higher performance requirements and lower acceptable leak rates in castings. Vacuum impregnation helps make this possible.

References

1. (2011) 2017-2025 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicle GHG Emissions and CAFE Standards: Supplemental Notice of Intent. 2017-2025_CAFE-GHG_Supplemental_NOI07292011%20(2).pdf

2. Brescher, S. (2012) 54.5 MPG and Beyond: Materials Lighten the Load for Fuel Economy. https://energy.gov/articles/545-mpg-and-beyond-materials-lighten-load-fuel-economy

This article is protected by copyright. You want to use it for your own purpose? Infos can be found under www.mycontentfactory.de (ID: 45297084)

About the author

Ralf Versmold

Ralf Versmold

Managing Director, Godfrey & Wing

More articles by this author

You might also be interested in CLOSE OPEN

Euroguss; Stefan Bausewein; BMW; Godfrey & Wing Inc.; ©tum2282 - stock.adobe.com; Godfrey & Wing; Reed; Sputtering Components Inc.; Pixabay; HP; Bedrunka+Hirth; Audi AG; ©magele-picture - stock.adobe.com; Constellium; Grob-Werke