Mobile-Menu
Search
Ralf Versmold

Ralf Versmold

Managing Director, Godfrey & Wing

What Size of Porosity Can Vacuum Impregnation Seal?

| Author / Editor: Ralf Versmold / Daniel Richter

The goal of a foundry is to produce high quality die castings that meet or exceed the customer’s specifications at a competitive cost. In some cases, those specifications call out maximum defect size and/or require that the part must hold pressurized fluid or gasses.

Metal casting porosity can affect the part’s structural integrity, creating a failure point.
( Bild: Godfrey & Wing Inc. )

Foundries use vacuum impregnation when the defect size is less than the maximum allowed amount, yet the part still is not capable of holding fluids or gasses under pressure. Vacuum impregnation is a proven process that seals internal defects without impacting any other feature of the manufactured part.

Many times the question is asked “What size of porosity can vacuum impregnation seal?”. This is undoubtedly due to the customer attempting to seal a defect to the maximum specification. For example, the assumption is that if the maximum defect is 5mm and vacuum impregnation can seal a 5mm defect then vacuum impregnation will be effective.

Unfortunately, this is an oversimplification of a much larger question. If the goal is to produce die castings that do not leak fluids under pressure, then “What size of porosity can vacuum impregnation seal?” is the wrong question (Image 1). The challenge is not to seal individual pores. Instead, one needs to understand the leak path, which is created by a series of interconnected pores.

What is Porosity?

While some refer to porosity as a defect, it occurs naturally and is found in most materials, both man-made and in nature. In metal castings, porosity is typically considered any void found in the casting. Casting porosity can be caused by gas formation or solidification while the metal is being moved from a liquid state to a solid state. This porosity can range in size, from sub-micron to voids greater than 10 mm wide, depending on the casting.

Metal casting porosity can affect the part’s structural integrity, creating a failure point. Porosity can also prevent the part from being pressure tight. This will impact performance if the part is designed to hold gases or fluids.

Understanding Leak Paths

Generally speaking, one pore does not cause a leak path. Instead, a leak path is usually created through a series of interconnected pores. For this reason, it is difficult to pinpoint a generic porosity range that vacuum impregnation can seal.

For example, a breach caused by a 5mm pore interconnected with a series of smaller pores will be easily sealed (Image 2).

Conversely, the same 5mm pore breaching a 5mm wall will be difficult—if not impossible—to seal, as there is little casting material for the sealant to adhere (Image 3). A pore of that nature has characteristics similar to surface porosity which is not a candidate for sealing through vacuum impregnation. The large open pore breaches both casting walls and is sometimes called “see through” porosity.

It is important to understand that all materials permit leakage over time. In order for vacuum impregnation to effectively seal the leak and maximize the amount of acceptable parts, the manufacturer needs to define the part’s performance requirements, and develop measurable and repeatable standards around those needs. Defining these standards is done through leak rate testing. Vacuum impregnation is then used to seal specific leak paths to achieve the pre-defined leak rate.


Purpose of Leak Rate Testing

The purpose of leak rate testing is to confirm that the manufacturing process is performing to specification and making acceptable parts. Finding defective parts early in the manufacturing process will reduce field failures, minimize unforeseen costs, and improve customer satisfaction.

Setting a Leak Rate Standard

Inspecting die castings requires quantitative, measurable values that define what is and isn’t acceptable given a part’s intended use. The fact is even materials cast with careful processes will allow some leakage, given enough time. Casting manufacturers develop and adhere to leak rate standards. Such standards define the maximum tolerable leakage for a part, typically specified by cc/min at a specified pressure and time duration.

Air vs. Liquid Leak Testing

Most automotive components operate with liquid. However, air is primarily used in leak rate testing for the following reasons:

  • 1. Air is compressible and has a lower viscosity than liquid. Air can travel through a leak approximately 100-400 times faster than a liquid.
  • 2. Air has no surface tension. This allows it to escape a leak more easily than a liquid.
  • 3. Overall, testing methods using air are faster to conduct than those using a liquid.

Understanding Testing Protocols

To save time and resources, most manufacturers use the industry-recognized leak rates that are available for many products. Figure 1 shows typical ranges for existing parts.

At times, industry recognized standards are not relevant for a part’s application. To establish new standards, those parts should be analyzed through the following steps:

1. Test a large sample of production parts with an air leak tester at the same part working pressure and time.

2. Pressurize parts with water at the same working pressure. This testing identifies the approximate hole size (measured by air leak rate) that does not allow fluid to flow through. The part’s resistance to fluid flow is defined by the hole diameter, part length, hole surface finish, fluid viscosity, and surface tension.

3. Set the reject leak rate at a point close to but below the highest air leak rate that does not allow fluid to leak.

4. The final leak rate tolerance should be stated as “specified air leak rate at specified test pressure and time duration”.

It is important to note that even after a casting is sealed and passes the leak test criteria, the casting can still exhibit leaks under more aggressive test conditions. Recall that all materials will leak in varying degrees. If the test standards were established so that the casting would hold oil a 1 bar, it may still exhibit a leak if tested with air or helium at 1 bar. Gasses are thinner than liquids (e.x. sealant, oil, etc.) and will leak through a path that would not pass fluids.


What is the Role of Vacuum Impregnation in this Process?

Once a leak rate is defined, parts within that range can be sealed through vacuum impregnation. Parts outside of the leak rate parameters are typically scrapped.

Vacuum Impregnation is a process that seals metal casting porosity. Specifically, it seals the internal, interconnecting path of porosity, which breaches the casting wall (Image 4). The process is not a surface treatment, so it does not seal open pores found on the casting surface. Nor is it intended to seal casting structural defects such as cracks or open knit lines.

In Summary

The wide range of casting parameters creates a limitless array of shapes and sizes of porosity possibilities. Despite this, vacuum impregnation can seal porosity of any size. While vacuum impregnation can seal porosity of any size, it is important to realize that the leak path is the key characteristic to evaluate and not pore size. A leak path is created through a series of interconnect pores, and not a single pore. Instead of asking “What size of porosity can vacuum impregnation seal?” one should ask “Can vacuum impregnation seal the leak path?”

This article is protected by copyright. You want to use it for your own purpose? Infos can be found under www.mycontentfactory.de (ID: 45483494)

About the author

Ralf Versmold

Ralf Versmold

Managing Director, Godfrey & Wing

More articles by this author

You might also be interested in CLOSE OPEN

Godfrey & Wing; Deutsche Messe; NuernbergMesse / Frank Boxler; Pixabay; Sputtering Components Inc.; Godfrey & Wing Inc.; DGS Druckguss Systeme AG, St. Gallen, Schweiz / EUROGUSS; Pexels; trinckle / Steve Bergmann; NürnbergMesse; MRT Castings; Rösler Oberflächentechnik; VCG; Pima Power; Volkswagen; Siemens; Horn/Sauermann; Deposit Photos